EXTRACT from "HAWKS OF THE HADHRAMAUT" by P S ALLFREE
The following description of building with mud comes from
the book “Hawks of the Hadhramaut” by PS Allfree, published by Robert Hale Ltd
in 1967. Mr Allfree had a military
career before going to the East Aden Protectorate in what is now South
Yemen. On p 145 he described the method
of building with mud which he had seen between 1955 and 1957, as follows :
“Take several dozen
donkey-loads of dry earth : a camel-back or two of straw. Add water. Knead well with the feet to make
a porridgy paste, spread paste two inches thick on the ground, slice it with a
wooden board into twelve-inch squares and leave to dry. The result : bricks.
Meanwhile the ground-plan,
sketched by the client on a rough scrap of paper, has been transferred to the
building site by means of pegs and stretched string. Two-foot trenches are hacked between the guide-lines by men with
mattocks, and filled in with chips of stone bound with cement.
When the foundations have
risen a few inches above ground level, the bricks – by now hard and firm – are
brought along on coolies’ heads from the stooks where they have been baking in
the sun. Stuck together with mud and
levelled by the same useful pieces of string, the brick courses go up until the
foreman thinks the walls are high enough, leaving holes here and there for
doors and windows. Hadhramaut builders
have been known to forget one of these until the ceiling is ready to go
on. No matter : a few pokes with a
crow-bar, a few slaps of mud, and all is well.
Lintels ? Two or three split
pine-logs or thorn branches, with grass or twigs stuffed in between to stop the
upper layers of brick from crumbling through.
For the ceiling, the same
material serves : logs or timbers laid across from wall to wall, close
together, and wadded with various bits and pieces of vegetation. If pillars have been indicated, by blobs or
dots on the scribbled plan, all we require is a few dozen lumps of rock from
the base of the cliff, a mason’s hammer, and a mason. Chipped into drums, piled one upon the other, pointed with
cement, they will stand like the columns of the Parthenon.
Building up from the simple
rectangular plan, it is generally easiest to proceed by a system of
diminution. For the first storey,
delete the corners, leaving a cross-shaped superstructure and four square
balconies. For the second floor cut off
the arms of the cross, leaving another but smaller replica of the ground floor.
And so on : this process can be
repeated until the top of the pile is a small central turret.
But so far the future
palace (or school) is merely a rough hollow cake of dried earth. For the icing we need a pile of chipped
limestone from the cliff-side, a kiln well-stoked with straw and palm-trunks,
and a modicum of sugar. We burn the
limestone, take it out of the kiln, lay it in the sun and bash it with massy
clubs. We mix the pulverised lime with
water and smear it on the outside of the building, several layers thick. It looks like plaster of Paris.
Now comes our
master-stroke. Using just the right
proportion of sugar, and one or two secret ingredients of our own if we are
“cordon bleus”, we concoct a plaster which is diamond hard and glaring
snow-white. We spread this resplendent
preparation throughout the inside, on walls, floors and ceiling; we paint it
thick on the crude stone pillars, transforming them into sheer marble columns;
and then we take in our practised hand a large round pebble and rub it all
over, like a Guardsman boning his boots, to produce a surface of pure
porcelain. If we now hire an artist we
can have the glittering interior picked out in pink, blue and gold, like the
Sultan’s Summer Palace, whirling tendrils and bursting buds all over the place;
and if we employ a specialist in decorative confectionery he will fashion knops
and coigns, balustrades and finials, all from the same plaster, until the whole
thing resembles a mad millionaire’s dream-house – which is precisely what some of
them are.”
Comments
Post a Comment